Destroying the Theory of Evolution before it could even happen Part 3

(not actual title)

This and other articles can be found in the book, In the Beginning…Soup? Click Here to order!

                   By Thomas F. Heinze        Used with permission     

Others claim that RNA came first, perhaps formed by contact with a clay template, then went on to produce the first cell. This implies that the clay passed on the basic information which natural selection later perfected. Neither soup nor clay has this or any other information, but if clay had information, what are the chances that it had the right information to form the first RNA? Why not something simpler, like the directions for repairing an airplane engine or making more clay?

If clay or organic soup had passed on the directions for making RNA, how did the RNA know to make proteins? And out of millions of possible proteins, why would it have made exactly the proteins a cell would need? Could it have folded, addressed, and regulated all those proteins and enclosed them in a membrane?

Because all known information comes from a mind, the presence of large quantities of organized information in cells is evidence that a mind was involved. Faith in the fantasy that the cell with all its information came from clay or organic broth is contrary to the evidence. It is anti-science and should not be used to promote the religion of atheism in our tax supported public schools. Nor should the evidence that information always comes from a mind be suppressed. Some Christians pay for private schools to teach that God created. Atheists have freedom to have their schools, and should not be allowed to use tax dollars to hide scientific evidence and promote in public school books their faith that there is no Creator.

Clay that could produce a simple RNA, capable of making copies of itself, would have been more intelligent than all of today's origin of life scientists put together. They can't produce any RNA at all,⁶ let alone one with these special abilities.

Some claim that the amount of information depends only on the number of "letters," and that if you add random letters instead of creating typographical errors, you increase the information. But not in the book they wrote! Neither would sprinkling ink here and there in their book produce more information. The more ink is sprinkled, the more information is covered up. Those who claim chance occurrences add information confuse static with message in a desperate attempt to save their atheistic faith.

Miniaturization

The evidence that an intelligent Creator made the information in DNA is reinforced by the fact that the information in both human DNA and in "primitive" cells takes up the least space possible.⁸

After a number of intelligent scientists had worked for many years developing ever better microfilm they fit the entire Bible on one 32 X 33 mm film. Amazing! However, that same space covered with DNA would hold information equivalent to 7.7 million Bibles!⁹ If DNA was formed with no intelligent input as biology books often imply, why did it take generations of intelligent scientists thousands of man hours to develop the millions of times less efficient microfilm?

No matter how strong the atheist's faith may be, his belief that the information in cells formed with no mind involved is not in line with the facts. The evidence indicates that the information in DNA was put there by a Creator who is so intelligent that we should listen to everything He has to say.

All available evidence indicates that it takes intelligence to devise letters or code, and arrange them into instructions. Many evolutionists ignore the evidence and claim that life arose from an "organic soup," but how could the imagined soup know the precise order of each of the amino acids of even one protein, let alone the hundreds of proteins necessary for the survival of a "primitive" cell?